Commit c0da9c21 authored by Daniel Starke's avatar Daniel Starke Committed by Cui GaoSheng
Browse files

tty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()

mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.10-rc1
commit 47388e807f85948eefc403a8a5fdc5b406a65d5a
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9TAHR
CVE: CVE-2024-36016

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=47388e807f85948eefc403a8a5fdc5b406a65d5a



--------------------------------

Assuming the following:
- side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode
- side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1
- side A switches to advanced option mode
- side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm->len
  Reason: gsm->len is not used in advanced option mode.
- side A switches to basic option mode
- side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm->buf
  Reason: Neither gsm->state nor gsm->len have been reset after
  reconfiguration.

Fix this by changing gsm->count to gsm->len comparison from equal to less
than. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in
gsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of
gsm->len and gsm->mru.

All other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the
user configuration and actual payload size.

Reported-by: default avatar <j51569436@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218708


Tested-by: default avatar <j51569436@gmail.com>
Fixes: e1eaea46 ("tty: n_gsm line discipline")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424054842.7741-1-daniel.starke@siemens.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Conflicts:
        drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
[7a0e4b17 ("tty: n_gsm: fix frame reception handling") has not been
merged, context conflict]
Signed-off-by: default avatarCui GaoSheng <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
parent f5fda1e9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment