s390/pci: improve zpci_dev reference counting

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.118
commit f0931ee125ffc4e8be8ef27c36ca5811cff2a80b
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5L686

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=f0931ee125ffc4e8be8ef27c36ca5811cff2a80b



--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit c122383d ]

Currently zpci_dev uses kref based reference counting but only accounts
for one original reference plus one reference from an added pci_dev to
its underlying zpci_dev. Counting just the original reference worked
until the pci_dev reference was added in commit 2a671f77 ("s390/pci:
fix use after free of zpci_dev") because once a zpci_dev goes away, i.e.
enters the reserved state, it would immediately get released. However
with the pci_dev reference this is no longer the case and the zpci_dev
may still appear in multiple availability events indicating that it was
reserved. This was solved by detecting when the zpci_dev is already on
its way out but still hanging around. This has however shown some light
on how unusual our zpci_dev reference counting is.

Improve upon this by modelling zpci_dev reference counting on pci_dev.
Analogous to pci_get_slot() increment the reference count in
get_zdev_by_fid(). Thus all users of get_zdev_by_fid() must drop the
reference once they are done with the zpci_dev.

Similar to pci_scan_single_device(), zpci_create_device() returns the
device with an initial count of 1 and the device added to the zpci_list
(analogous to the PCI bus' device_list). In turn users of
zpci_create_device() must only drop the reference once the device is
gone from the point of view of the zPCI subsystem, it might still be
referenced by the common PCI subsystem though.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>