tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef

maillist inclusion
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8T2RT

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h=mpam/snapshot/v6.7-rc2



---------------------------

tick_nohz_full_mask lists the CPUs that are nohz_full. This is only
needed when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. tick_nohz_full_cpu() allows
a specific CPU to be tested against the mask, and evaluates to false
when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not defined.

The resctrl code needs to pick a CPU to run some work on, a new helper
prefers housekeeping CPUs by examining the tick_nohz_full_mask. Hiding
the declaration behind #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL forces all the users to
be behind an ifdef too.

Move the tick_nohz_full_mask declaration, this lets callers drop the
ifdef, and guard access to tick_nohz_full_mask with IS_ENABLED() or
something like tick_nohz_full_cpu().

The definition does not need to be moved as any callers should be
removed at compile time unless CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> # for resctrl dependency
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>