clk: zynqmp: pll: rectify rate rounding in zynqmp_pll_round_rate

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.150
commit 12d31182de8deb7a8e0be6246d661291773427c8
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6D0XA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=12d31182de8deb7a8e0be6246d661291773427c8



--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 30eaf021 ]

The function zynqmp_pll_round_rate is used to find a most appropriate
PLL frequency which the hardware can generate according to the desired
frequency. For example, if the desired frequency is 297MHz, considering
the limited range from PS_PLL_VCO_MIN (1.5GHz) to PS_PLL_VCO_MAX (3.0GHz)
of PLL, zynqmp_pll_round_rate should return 1.872GHz (297MHz * 5).

There are two problems with the current code of zynqmp_pll_round_rate:

1) When the rate is below PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, it can't find a correct rate
when the parameter "rate" is an integer multiple of *prate, in other words,
if "f" is zero, zynqmp_pll_round_rate won't return a valid frequency which
is from PS_PLL_VCO_MIN to PS_PLL_VCO_MAX. For example, *prate is 33MHz
and the rate is 660MHz, zynqmp_pll_round_rate will not boost up rate and
just return 660MHz, and this will cause clk_calc_new_rates failure since
zynqmp_pll_round_rate returns an invalid rate out of its boundaries.

2) Even if the rate is higher than PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, there is still a risk
that zynqmp_pll_round_rate returns an invalid rate because the function
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST makes some loss in the fractional part. If the parent
clock *prate is 33333333Hz and we want to set the PLL rate to 1.5GHz,
this function will return 1499999985Hz by using the formula below:
    value = *prate * DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, *prate)).
This value is also invalid since it's slightly smaller than PS_PLL_VCO_MIN.
because DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST makes some loss in the fractional part.

Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220826142030.213805-1-quanyang.wang@windriver.com


Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com>