Commit 340b42b3 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki Committed by Yang Yingliang
Browse files

cpuidle: poll_state: Revise loop termination condition

mainline inclusion
from mainline-4.20
commit 01bad1c6
category: feature
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.openeuler.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34


CVE: NA

If need_resched() returns "false", breaking out of the loop in
poll_idle() will cause a new idle state to be selected, so in fact
it usually doesn't make sense to spin in it longer than the target
residency of the second state.  [Note that the "polling" state is
used only if there is at least one "real" state defined in addition
to it, so the second state is always there.]  On the other hand,
breaking out of it early (say in case the next state is disabled)
shouldn't hurt as it is polling anyway.

For this reason, make the loop in poll_idle() break if the CPU has
been spinning longer than the target residency of the second state
(the "polling" state can only be state[0]).

Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYubo Miao <miaoyubo@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarXiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiajun Chen <chenjiajun8@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
parent 83ce73f0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment