Commit 12374038 authored by Zhou Qingyang's avatar Zhou Qingyang Committed by Zheng Zengkai
Browse files

net/mlx4_en: Fix an use-after-free bug in mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources()

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.84
commit f1d43efa59f1edd3e7eca0e94559b4c6b1cd4e2b
bugzilla: 186030 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4QV2F

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=f1d43efa59f1edd3e7eca0e94559b4c6b1cd4e2b



--------------------------------

commit addad764 upstream.

In mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources(), mlx4_en_copy_priv() is called and
tmp->tx_cq will be freed on the error path of mlx4_en_copy_priv().
After that mlx4_en_alloc_resources() is called and there is a dereference
of &tmp->tx_cq[t][i] in mlx4_en_alloc_resources(), which could lead to
a use after free problem on failure of mlx4_en_copy_priv().

Fix this bug by adding a check of mlx4_en_copy_priv()

This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs
differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations
(e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the
inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or
the callers, so they constitute bugs.

Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false
positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed
the bug.

Builds with CONFIG_MLX4_EN=m show no new warnings,
and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.

Fixes: ec25bc04 ("net/mlx4_en: Add resilience in low memory systems")
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhou Qingyang <zhou1615@umn.edu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211130164438.190591-1-zhou1615@umn.edu


Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
parent 4a502ba1
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment