Commit 07ccac60 authored by ruanjinjie's avatar ruanjinjie Committed by Zheng Zengkai
Browse files

arm64: fix a concurrency issue in emulation_proc_handler()

hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I65RG3?from=project-issue


CVE: NA

-------------------------------

In emulation_proc_handler(), read and write operations are performed on
insn->current_mode. In the concurrency scenario, mutex only protects
writing insn->current_mode, and not protects the read. Suppose there are
two concurrent tasks, task1 updates insn->current_mode to INSN_EMULATE
in the critical section, the prev_mode of task2 is still the old data
INSN_UNDEF of insn->current_mode. As a result, two tasks call
update_insn_emulation_mode twice with prev_mode = INSN_UNDEF and
current_mode = INSN_EMULATE, then call register_emulation_hooks twice,
resulting in a list_add double problem.

Call trace:
 __list_add_valid+0xd8/0xe4
 register_undef_hook+0x94/0x13c
 update_insn_emulation_mode+0xd0/0x12c
 emulation_proc_handler+0xd8/0xf4
 proc_sys_call_handler+0x140/0x250
 proc_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c
 new_sync_write+0xec/0x18c
 vfs_write+0x214/0x2ac
 ksys_write+0x70/0xfc
 __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30
 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x1bc
 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x94
 el0_svc+0x20/0x30
 el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb4
 el0_sync+0x160/0x180

Fixes: fcddf02a ("arm64: fix oops in concurrently setting insn_emulation sysctls")
Signed-off-by: default avatarruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLiao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarZhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
parent 0d2a1f9e
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment