Skip to content
Commit 05087360 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki
Browse files

ACPI / PM: Take SMART_SUSPEND driver flag into account



Make the ACPI PM domain take DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND into account in
its system suspend callbacks.

[Note that the pm_runtime_suspended() check in acpi_dev_needs_resume()
is an optimization, because if is not passed, all of the subsequent
checks may be skipped and some of them are much more overhead in
general.]

Also use the observation that if the device is in runtime suspend
at the beginning of the "late" phase of a system-wide suspend-like
transition, its state cannot change going forward (runtime PM is
disabled for it at that time) until the transition is over and the
subsequent system-wide PM callbacks should be skipped for it (as
they generally assume the device to not be suspended), so add
checks for that in acpi_subsys_suspend_late/noirq() and
acpi_subsys_freeze_late/noirq().

Moreover, if acpi_subsys_resume_noirq() is called during the
subsequent system-wide resume transition and if the device was left
in runtime suspend previously, its runtime PM status needs to be
changed to "active" as it is going to be put into the full-power
state going forward, so add a check for that too in there.

In turn, if acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq() runs after the device has been
left in runtime suspend, the subsequent "thaw" callbacks need
to be skipped for it (as they may not work correctly with a
suspended device), so set the power.direct_complete flag for the
device then to make the PM core skip those callbacks.

On top of the above, make the analogous changes in the acpi_lpss
driver that uses the ACPI PM domain callbacks.

Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent c4b65157
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment