Commit ec9f10fe authored by Max Reitz's avatar Max Reitz
Browse files

block: Generalize should_update_child() rule



Currently, bdrv_replace_node() refuses to create loops from one BDS to
itself if the BDS to be replaced is the backing node of the BDS to
replace it: Say there is a node A and a node B.  Replacing B by A means
making all references to B point to A.  If B is a child of A (i.e. A has
a reference to B), that would mean we would have to make this reference
point to A itself -- so we'd create a loop.

bdrv_replace_node() (through should_update_child()) refuses to do so if
B is the backing node of A.  There is no reason why we should create
loops if B is not the backing node of A, though.  The BDS graph should
never contain loops, so we should always refuse to create them.

If B is a child of A and B is to be replaced by A, we should simply
leave B in place there because it is the most sensible choice.

A more specific argument would be: Putting filter drivers into the BDS
graph is basically the same as appending an overlay to a backing chain.
But the main child BDS of a filter driver is not "backing" but "file",
so restricting the no-loop rule to backing nodes would fail here.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-id: 20180613181823.13618-7-mreitz@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
parent 138f9fff
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+34 −10
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3427,16 +3427,39 @@ static bool should_update_child(BdrvChild *c, BlockDriverState *to)
        return false;
    }

    if (c->role == &child_backing) {
        /* If @from is a backing file of @to, ignore the child to avoid
         * creating a loop. We only want to change the pointer of other
         * parents. */
    /* If the child @c belongs to the BDS @to, replacing the current
     * c->bs by @to would mean to create a loop.
     *
     * Such a case occurs when appending a BDS to a backing chain.
     * For instance, imagine the following chain:
     *
     *   guest device -> node A -> further backing chain...
     *
     * Now we create a new BDS B which we want to put on top of this
     * chain, so we first attach A as its backing node:
     *
     *                   node B
     *                     |
     *                     v
     *   guest device -> node A -> further backing chain...
     *
     * Finally we want to replace A by B.  When doing that, we want to
     * replace all pointers to A by pointers to B -- except for the
     * pointer from B because (1) that would create a loop, and (2)
     * that pointer should simply stay intact:
     *
     *   guest device -> node B
     *                     |
     *                     v
     *                   node A -> further backing chain...
     *
     * In general, when replacing a node A (c->bs) by a node B (@to),
     * if A is a child of B, that means we cannot replace A by B there
     * because that would create a loop.  Silently detaching A from B
     * is also not really an option.  So overall just leaving A in
     * place there is the most sensible choice. */
    QLIST_FOREACH(to_c, &to->children, next) {
        if (to_c == c) {
                break;
            }
        }
        if (to_c) {
            return false;
        }
    }
@@ -3462,6 +3485,7 @@ void bdrv_replace_node(BlockDriverState *from, BlockDriverState *to,

    /* Put all parents into @list and calculate their cumulative permissions */
    QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(c, &from->parents, next_parent, next) {
        assert(c->bs == from);
        if (!should_update_child(c, to)) {
            continue;
        }