Commit 6bf77e1c authored by Alberto Garcia's avatar Alberto Garcia Committed by Kevin Wolf
Browse files

throttle: Correct access to wrong BlockBackendPublic structures



In 27ccdd52 the throttling fields were
moved from BlockDriverState to BlockBackend. However in a few cases
the code started using throttling fields from the active BlockBackend
instead of the round-robin token, making the algorithm behave
incorrectly.

This can cause starvation if there's a throttling group with several
drives but only one of them has I/O.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reported-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
parent 3ac2f2f7
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+23 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -168,6 +168,22 @@ static BlockBackend *throttle_group_next_blk(BlockBackend *blk)
    return blk_by_public(next);
}

/*
 * Return whether a BlockBackend has pending requests.
 *
 * This assumes that tg->lock is held.
 *
 * @blk: the BlockBackend
 * @is_write:  the type of operation (read/write)
 * @ret:       whether the BlockBackend has pending requests.
 */
static inline bool blk_has_pending_reqs(BlockBackend *blk,
                                        bool is_write)
{
    const BlockBackendPublic *blkp = blk_get_public(blk);
    return blkp->pending_reqs[is_write];
}

/* Return the next BlockBackend in the round-robin sequence with pending I/O
 * requests.
 *
@@ -188,7 +204,7 @@ static BlockBackend *next_throttle_token(BlockBackend *blk, bool is_write)

    /* get next bs round in round robin style */
    token = throttle_group_next_blk(token);
    while (token != start && !blkp->pending_reqs[is_write]) {
    while (token != start && !blk_has_pending_reqs(token, is_write)) {
        token = throttle_group_next_blk(token);
    }

@@ -196,10 +212,13 @@ static BlockBackend *next_throttle_token(BlockBackend *blk, bool is_write)
     * then decide the token is the current bs because chances are
     * the current bs get the current request queued.
     */
    if (token == start && !blkp->pending_reqs[is_write]) {
    if (token == start && !blk_has_pending_reqs(token, is_write)) {
        token = blk;
    }

    /* Either we return the original BB, or one with pending requests */
    assert(token == blk || blk_has_pending_reqs(token, is_write));

    return token;
}

@@ -257,7 +276,7 @@ static void schedule_next_request(BlockBackend *blk, bool is_write)

    /* Check if there's any pending request to schedule next */
    token = next_throttle_token(blk, is_write);
    if (!blkp->pending_reqs[is_write]) {
    if (!blk_has_pending_reqs(token, is_write)) {
        return;
    }

@@ -271,7 +290,7 @@ static void schedule_next_request(BlockBackend *blk, bool is_write)
            qemu_co_queue_next(&blkp->throttled_reqs[is_write])) {
            token = blk;
        } else {
            ThrottleTimers *tt = &blkp->throttle_timers;
            ThrottleTimers *tt = &blk_get_public(token)->throttle_timers;
            int64_t now = qemu_clock_get_ns(tt->clock_type);
            timer_mod(tt->timers[is_write], now + 1);
            tg->any_timer_armed[is_write] = true;