+1
−1
Loading
int64_t is in all likelihood the actual scalar type we want. Yep, really. Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219541 Signed-off-by:John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>