Skip to content
Commit c1753fd0 authored by Mathieu Desnoyers's avatar Mathieu Desnoyers Committed by Andrew Morton
Browse files

mm: move mm_count into its own cache line

The mm_struct mm_count field is frequently updated by mmgrab/mmdrop
performed by context switch.  This causes false-sharing for surrounding
mm_struct fields which are read-mostly.

This has been observed on a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids
server running hackbench, and by the kernel test robot will-it-scale
testcase.

Move the mm_count field into its own cache line to prevent false-sharing
with other mm_struct fields.

Move mm_count to the first field of mm_struct to minimize the amount of
padding required: rather than adding padding before and after the mm_count
field, padding is only added after mm_count.

Note that I noticed this odd comment in mm_struct:

commit 2e302543 ("mm: relocate 'write_protect_seq' in struct mm_struct")

                /*
                 * With some kernel config, the current mmap_lock's offset
                 * inside 'mm_struct' is at 0x120, which is very optimal, as
                 * its two hot fields 'count' and 'owner' sit in 2 different
                 * cachelines,  and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
                 * of the 2 fields will be accessed frequently, current layout
                 * will help to reduce cache bouncing.
                 *
                 * So please be careful with adding new fields before
                 * mmap_lock, which can easily push the 2 fields into one
                 * cacheline.
                 */
                struct rw_semaphore mmap_lock;

This comment is rather odd for a few reasons:

- It requires addition/removal of mm_struct fields to carefully consider
  field alignment of _other_ fields,
- It expresses the wish to keep an "optimal" alignment for a specific
  kernel config.

I suspect that the author of this comment may want to revisit this topic
and perhaps introduce a split-struct approach for struct rw_semaphore,
if the need is to place various fields of this structure in different
cache lines.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230515143536.114960-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Fixes: 223baf9d ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Fixes: af7f588d ("sched: Introduce per-memory-map concurrency ID")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a0c1db1-103d-d518-ed96-1584a28fbf32@efficios.com


Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305151017.27581d75-yujie.liu@intel.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohn Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Olivier Dion <odion@efficios.com>
Cc: <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 025b7799
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment