Skip to content
Commit 5f89468e authored by Bumyong Lee's avatar Bumyong Lee Committed by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Browse files

swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset



in case of driver wants to sync part of ranges with offset,
swiotlb_tbl_sync_single() copies from orig_addr base to tlb_addr with
offset and ends up with data mismatch.

It was removed from
"swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single",
but said logic has to be added back in.

From Linus's email:
"That commit which the removed the offset calculation entirely, because the old

        (unsigned long)tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)

was wrong, but instead of removing it, I think it should have just
fixed it to be

        (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);

instead. That way the slot offset always matches the slot index calculation."

(Unfortunatly that broke NVMe).

The use-case that drivers are hitting is as follow:

1. Get dma_addr_t from dma_map_single()

dma_addr_t tlb_addr = dma_map_single(dev, vaddr, vsize, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

    |<---------------vsize------------->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |                                   | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<---------------vsize------------->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |                                   | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

2. Do something
3. Sync dma_addr_t through dma_sync_single_for_device(..)

dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, tlb_addr + offset, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

  Error case.
    Copy data to original buffer but it is from base addr (instead of
  base addr + offset) in original buffer:

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |            |##########|           | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

    |<- size ->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |##########|                        | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

The fix is to copy the data to the original buffer and take into
account the offset, like so:

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |            |##########|           | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

    |<- offset ->|<- size ->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |            |##########|           | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

[One fix which was Linus's that made more sense to as it created a
symmetry would break NVMe. The reason for that is the:
 unsigned int offset = (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);

would come up with the proper offset, but it would lose the
alignment (which this patch contains).]

Fixes: 16fc3cef ("swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reported-by: default avatarDominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
Reported-by: default avatarHoria Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
Tested-by: default avatarHoria Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
parent dfc06b38
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment