bpf, x86: Fix bpf mapping of atomic fetch implementation

Fix the case where the dst register maps to %rax as otherwise this produces
an incorrect mapping with the implementation in 981f94c3 ("bpf: Add
bitwise atomic instructions") as %rax is clobbered given it's part of the
cmpxchg as operand.

The issue is similar to b29dd96b ("bpf, x86: Fix BPF_FETCH atomic and/or/
xor with r0 as src") just that the case of dst register was missed.

Before, dst=r0 (%rax) src=r2 (%rsi):

  [...]
  c5:   mov    %rax,%r10
  c8:   mov    0x0(%rax),%rax       <---+ (broken)
  cc:   mov    %rax,%r11                |
  cf:   and    %rsi,%r11                |
  d2:   lock cmpxchg %r11,0x0(%rax) <---+
  d8:   jne    0x00000000000000c8       |
  da:   mov    %rax,%rsi                |
  dd:   mov    %r10,%rax                |
  [...]                                 |
                                        |
After, dst=r0 (%rax) src=r2 (%rsi):     |
                                        |
  [...]                                 |
  da:	mov    %rax,%r10                |
  dd:	mov    0x0(%r10),%rax       <---+ (fixed)
  e1:	mov    %rax,%r11                |
  e4:	and    %rsi,%r11                |
  e7:	lock cmpxchg %r11,0x0(%r10) <---+
  ed:	jne    0x00000000000000dd
  ef:	mov    %rax,%rsi
  f2:	mov    %r10,%rax
  [...]

The remaining combinations were fine as-is though:

After, dst=r9 (%r15) src=r0 (%rax):

  [...]
  dc:	mov    %rax,%r10
  df:	mov    0x0(%r15),%rax
  e3:	mov    %rax,%r11
  e6:	and    %r10,%r11
  e9:	lock cmpxchg %r11,0x0(%r15)
  ef:	jne    0x00000000000000df      _
  f1:	mov    %rax,%r10                | (unneeded, but
  f4:	mov    %r10,%rax               _|  not a problem)
  [...]

After, dst=r9 (%r15) src=r4 (%rcx):

  [...]
  de:	mov    %rax,%r10
  e1:	mov    0x0(%r15),%rax
  e5:	mov    %rax,%r11
  e8:	and    %rcx,%r11
  eb:	lock cmpxchg %r11,0x0(%r15)
  f1:	jne    0x00000000000000e1
  f3:	mov    %rax,%rcx
  f6:	mov    %r10,%rax
  [...]

The case of dst == src register is rejected by the verifier and
therefore not supported, but x86 JIT also handles this case just
fine.

After, dst=r0 (%rax) src=r0 (%rax):

  [...]
  eb:	mov    %rax,%r10
  ee:	mov    0x0(%r10),%rax
  f2:	mov    %rax,%r11
  f5:	and    %r10,%r11
  f8:	lock cmpxchg %r11,0x0(%r10)
  fe:	jne    0x00000000000000ee
 100:	mov    %rax,%r10
 103:	mov    %r10,%rax
  [...]

Fixes: 981f94c3 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Reported-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>