Skip to content
Commit 204474a6 authored by Lyude Paul's avatar Lyude Paul Committed by Jani Nikula
Browse files

drm/i915: Pass down rc in intel_encoder->compute_config()



Something that I completely missed when implementing the new MST VCPI
atomic helpers is that with those helpers, there's technically a chance
of us having to grab additional modeset locks in ->compute_config() and
furthermore, that means we have the potential to hit a normal modeset
deadlock. However, because ->compute_config() only returns a bool this
means we can't return -EDEADLK when we need to drop locks and try again
which means we end up just failing the atomic check permanently. Whoops.

So, fix this by modifying ->compute_config() to pass down an actual
error code instead of a bool so that the atomic check can be restarted
on modeset deadlocks.

Thanks to Ville Syrjälä for pointing this out!

Changes since v1:
* Add some newlines
* Return only -EINVAL from hsw_crt_compute_config()
* Propogate return code from intel_dp_compute_dsc_params()
* Change all of the intel_dp_compute_link_config*() variants
* Don't miss if (hdmi_port_clock_valid()) branch in
  intel_hdmi_compute_config()

[Cherry-picked from drm-misc-next to drm-intel-next-queued to fix
 linux-next & drm-tip conflict, while waiting for proper propagation of
 the DP MST series that this commit fixes. In hindsight, a topic branch
 might have been a better approach for it.]

Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: eceae147 ("drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109320


Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190115200800.3121-1-lyude@redhat.com
(cherry picked from commit 96550555

)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
parent 9e267d28
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment