Skip to content
Commit b0c79224 authored by Valentin Schneider's avatar Valentin Schneider Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

sched/fair: Clean up definition of NOHZ blocked load functions



cfs_rq_has_blocked() and others_have_blocked() are only used within
update_blocked_averages(). The !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED version of the
latter calls them within a #define CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON block, whereas
the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED one calls them unconditionnally.

As reported by Qian, the above leads to this warning in
!CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON configs:

  kernel/sched/fair.c: In function 'update_blocked_averages':
  kernel/sched/fair.c:7750:7: warning: variable 'done' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

It wouldn't be wrong to keep cfs_rq_has_blocked() and
others_have_blocked() as they are, but since their only current use is
to figure out when we can stop calling update_blocked_averages() on
fully decayed NOHZ idle CPUs, we can give them a new definition for
!CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON.

Change the definition of cfs_rq_has_blocked() and
others_have_blocked() for !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON so that the
NOHZ-specific blocks of update_blocked_averages() become no-ops and
the 'done' variable gets optimised out.

While at it, remove the CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON block from the
!CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED definition of update_blocked_averages() by
using the newly-introduced update_blocked_load_status() helper.

No change in functionality intended.

[ Additions by Peter Zijlstra. ]

Reported-by: default avatarQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190603115424.7951-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent e3b929b0
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment