drm/i915: Avoid writing relocs with addresses in non-canonical form

According to PRM, some parts of HW require the addresses to be in
a canonical form, where bits [63:48] == [47]. Let's convert addresses to
canonical form prior to relocating and return converted offsets to
userspace. We also need to make sure that userspace is using addresses
in canonical form in case of softpin.

v2: Whitespace fixup, gen8_canonical_addr description (Chris, Ville)
v3: Rebase on top of softpin, fix a hole in relocate_entry,
    s/expect/require (Chris)
v4: Handle softpin in validate_exec_list (Chris)
v5: Convert back to canonical form at copy_to_user time (Chris)
v6: Don't use struct exec_object2 in place of exec_object
v7: Use sign_extend64 for converting to canonical form (Joonas),
    reject non-canonical and non-page-aligned offset for softpin (Chris)
v8: Convert back to non-canonical form in a function,
    split the test for EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED (Chris)
v9: s/canonial/canonical, drop accidental double newline (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1451409892-13708-1-git-send-email-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Testcase: igt/gem_bad_reloc/negative-reloc-blt
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92699


Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>