Skip to content
Commit ec25a9ce authored by David Arinzon's avatar David Arinzon Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

net: ena: Wrong missing IO completions check order



[ Upstream commit f7e41718 ]

Missing IO completions check is called every second (HZ jiffies).
This commit fixes several issues with this check:

1. Duplicate queues check:
   Max of 4 queues are scanned on each check due to monitor budget.
   Once reaching the budget, this check exits under the assumption that
   the next check will continue to scan the remainder of the queues,
   but in practice, next check will first scan the last already scanned
   queue which is not necessary and may cause the full queue scan to
   last a couple of seconds longer.
   The fix is to start every check with the next queue to scan.
   For example, on 8 IO queues:
   Bug: [0,1,2,3], [3,4,5,6], [6,7]
   Fix: [0,1,2,3], [4,5,6,7]

2. Unbalanced queues check:
   In case the number of active IO queues is not a multiple of budget,
   there will be checks which don't utilize the full budget
   because the full scan exits when reaching the last queue id.
   The fix is to run every TX completion check with exact queue budget
   regardless of the queue id.
   For example, on 7 IO queues:
   Bug: [0,1,2,3], [4,5,6], [0,1,2,3]
   Fix: [0,1,2,3], [4,5,6,0], [1,2,3,4]
   The budget may be lowered in case the number of IO queues is less
   than the budget (4) to make sure there are no duplicate queues on
   the same check.
   For example, on 3 IO queues:
   Bug: [0,1,2,0], [1,2,0,1]
   Fix: [0,1,2], [0,1,2]

Fixes: 1738cd3e ("net: ena: Add a driver for Amazon Elastic Network Adapters (ENA)")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAmit Bernstein <amitbern@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Arinzon <darinzon@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent e667a05c
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment