x86/hyperv: Micro-optimize send_ipi_one()

When sending an IPI to a single CPU there is no need to deal with cpumasks.

With 2 CPU guest on WS2019 a minor (like 3%, 8043 -> 7761 CPU cycles)
improvement with smp_call_function_single() loop benchmark can be seeb. The
optimization, however, is tiny and straitforward. Also, send_ipi_one() is
important for PV spinlock kick.

Switching to the regular APIC IPI send for CPU > 64 case does not make
sense as it is twice as expesive (12650 CPU cycles for __send_ipi_mask_ex()
call, 26000 for orig_apic.send_IPI(cpu, vector)).

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191027151938.7296-1-vkuznets@redhat.com