ipv4: Fix incorrect route flushing when source address is deleted
[ Upstream commit f96a3d74 ] Cited commit added the table ID to the FIB info structure, but did not prevent structures with different table IDs from being consolidated. This can lead to routes being flushed from a VRF when an address is deleted from a different VRF. Fix by taking the table ID into account when looking for a matching FIB info. This is already done for FIB info structures backed by a nexthop object in fib_find_info_nh(). Add test cases that fail before the fix: # ./fib_tests.sh -t ipv4_del_addr IPv4 delete address route tests Regular FIB info TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in default VRF not removed [ OK ] TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete [ OK ] Identical FIB info with different table ID TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted [FAIL] TEST: Route in default VRF not removed [ OK ] RTNETLINK answers: File exists TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete [FAIL] Tests passed: 6 Tests failed: 2 And pass after: # ./fib_tests.sh -t ipv4_del_addr IPv4 delete address route tests Regular FIB info TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in default VRF not removed [ OK ] TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete [ OK ] Identical FIB info with different table ID TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in default VRF not removed [ OK ] TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ] TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete [ OK ] Tests passed: 8 Tests failed: 0 Fixes: 5a56a0b3 ("net: Don't delete routes in different VRFs") Signed-off-by:Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: