riscv: Change to use positive offset to access relocation entries
The codes currently skip the very first relocation entry, and have an inaccurate comment "skip first reserved entry" indicating that the first entry is reserved, but later it references the elements in the first relocation entry using a minus offset. Change to use a positive offset so that there is no need to skip the first relocation entry. Signed-off-by:Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> Reviewed-by:
Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment