Skip to content
Commit efe79050 authored by Hamish Martin's avatar Hamish Martin Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

tipc: only process unicast on intended node

We have observed complete lock up of broadcast-link transmission due to
unacknowledged packets never being removed from the 'transmq' queue. This
is traced to nodes having their ack field set beyond the sequence number
of packets that have actually been transmitted to them.
Consider an example where node 1 has sent 10 packets to node 2 on a
link and node 3 has sent 20 packets to node 2 on another link. We
see examples of an ack from node 2 destined for node 3 being treated as
an ack from node 2 at node 1. This leads to the ack on the node 1 to node
2 link being increased to 20 even though we have only sent 10 packets.
When node 1 does get around to sending further packets, none of the
packets with sequence numbers less than 21 are actually removed from the
transmq.
To resolve this we reinstate some code lost in commit d999297c

 ("tipc:
reduce locking scope during packet reception") which ensures that only
messages destined for the receiving node are processed by that node. This
prevents the sequence numbers from getting out of sync and resolves the
packet leakage, thereby resolving the broadcast-link transmission
lock-ups we observed.

While we are aware that this change only patches over a root problem that
we still haven't identified, this is a sanity test that it is always
legitimate to do. It will remain in the code even after we identify and
fix the real problem.

Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohn Thompson <john.thompson@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHamish Martin <hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 0b86a2a1
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment