Commit e80a48ba authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

x86/tdx: Remove TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI



Now that arch_cpu_idle() is expected to return with IRQs disabled,
avoid the useless STI/CLI dance.

Per the specs this is supposed to work, but nobody has yet relied up
this behaviour so broken implementations are possible.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: default avatarUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.682137572@infradead.org
parent 89b30987
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+0 −13
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -139,19 +139,6 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)

	movl $TDVMCALL_EXPOSE_REGS_MASK, %ecx

	/*
	 * For the idle loop STI needs to be called directly before the TDCALL
	 * that enters idle (EXIT_REASON_HLT case). STI instruction enables
	 * interrupts only one instruction later. If there is a window between
	 * STI and the instruction that emulates the HALT state, there is a
	 * chance for interrupts to happen in this window, which can delay the
	 * HLT operation indefinitely. Since this is the not the desired
	 * result, conditionally call STI before TDCALL.
	 */
	testq $TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI, %rsi
	jz .Lskip_sti
	sti
.Lskip_sti:
	tdcall

	/*
+4 −19
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int ve_instr_len(struct ve_info *ve)
	}
}

static u64 __cpuidle __halt(const bool irq_disabled, const bool do_sti)
static u64 __cpuidle __halt(const bool irq_disabled)
{
	struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
		.r10 = TDX_HYPERCALL_STANDARD,
@@ -240,20 +240,14 @@ static u64 __cpuidle __halt(const bool irq_disabled, const bool do_sti)
	 * can keep the vCPU in virtual HLT, even if an IRQ is
	 * pending, without hanging/breaking the guest.
	 */
	return __tdx_hypercall(&args, do_sti ? TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI : 0);
	return __tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
}

static int handle_halt(struct ve_info *ve)
{
	/*
	 * Since non safe halt is mainly used in CPU offlining
	 * and the guest will always stay in the halt state, don't
	 * call the STI instruction (set do_sti as false).
	 */
	const bool irq_disabled = irqs_disabled();
	const bool do_sti = false;

	if (__halt(irq_disabled, do_sti))
	if (__halt(irq_disabled))
		return -EIO;

	return ve_instr_len(ve);
@@ -261,22 +255,13 @@ static int handle_halt(struct ve_info *ve)

void __cpuidle tdx_safe_halt(void)
{
	 /*
	  * For do_sti=true case, __tdx_hypercall() function enables
	  * interrupts using the STI instruction before the TDCALL. So
	  * set irq_disabled as false.
	  */
	const bool irq_disabled = false;
	const bool do_sti = true;

	/*
	 * Use WARN_ONCE() to report the failure.
	 */
	if (__halt(irq_disabled, do_sti))
	if (__halt(irq_disabled))
		WARN_ONCE(1, "HLT instruction emulation failed\n");

	/* XXX I can't make sense of what @do_sti actually does */
	raw_local_irq_disable();
}

static int read_msr(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve)
+0 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
#define TDX_HYPERCALL_STANDARD  0

#define TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT	BIT(0)
#define TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI	BIT(1)

#define TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID	0x21
#define TDX_IDENT		"IntelTDX    "