Commit d2a3b7c5 authored by Hou Tao's avatar Hou Tao Committed by Alexei Starovoitov
Browse files

bpf: Fix net.core.bpf_jit_harden race



It is the bpf_jit_harden counterpart to commit 60b58afc ("bpf: fix
net.core.bpf_jit_enable race"). bpf_jit_harden will be tested twice
for each subprog if there are subprogs in bpf program and constant
blinding may increase the length of program, so when running
"./test_progs -t subprogs" and toggling bpf_jit_harden between 0 and 2,
jit_subprogs may fail because constant blinding increases the length
of subprog instructions during extra passs.

So cache the value of bpf_jit_blinding_enabled() during program
allocation, and use the cached value during constant blinding, subprog
JITing and args tracking of tail call.

Signed-off-by: default avatarHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309123321.2400262-4-houtao1@huawei.com
parent 73e14451
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ struct bpf_prog {
				gpl_compatible:1, /* Is filter GPL compatible? */
				cb_access:1,	/* Is control block accessed? */
				dst_needed:1,	/* Do we need dst entry? */
				blinding_requested:1, /* needs constant blinding */
				blinded:1,	/* Was blinded */
				is_func:1,	/* program is a bpf function */
				kprobe_override:1, /* Do we override a kprobe? */
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flag
	fp->aux = aux;
	fp->aux->prog = fp;
	fp->jit_requested = ebpf_jit_enabled();
	fp->blinding_requested = bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(fp);

	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&fp->aux->ksym.lnode);
	mutex_init(&fp->aux->used_maps_mutex);
@@ -1382,7 +1383,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog)
	struct bpf_insn *insn;
	int i, rewritten;

	if (!bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(prog) || prog->blinded)
	if (!prog->blinding_requested || prog->blinded)
		return prog;

	clone = bpf_prog_clone_create(prog, GFP_USER);
+3 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -13023,6 +13023,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
		func[i]->aux->name[0] = 'F';
		func[i]->aux->stack_depth = env->subprog_info[i].stack_depth;
		func[i]->jit_requested = 1;
		func[i]->blinding_requested = prog->blinding_requested;
		func[i]->aux->kfunc_tab = prog->aux->kfunc_tab;
		func[i]->aux->kfunc_btf_tab = prog->aux->kfunc_btf_tab;
		func[i]->aux->linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
@@ -13146,6 +13147,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
out_undo_insn:
	/* cleanup main prog to be interpreted */
	prog->jit_requested = 0;
	prog->blinding_requested = 0;
	for (i = 0, insn = prog->insnsi; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) {
		if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn))
			continue;
@@ -13239,7 +13241,6 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
	enum bpf_attach_type eatype = prog->expected_attach_type;
	bool expect_blinding = bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(prog);
	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(prog);
	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
@@ -13403,7 +13404,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
			insn->code = BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL;

			aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta];
			if (env->bpf_capable && !expect_blinding &&
			if (env->bpf_capable && !prog->blinding_requested &&
			    prog->jit_requested &&
			    !bpf_map_key_poisoned(aux) &&
			    !bpf_map_ptr_poisoned(aux) &&