Commit c94f0625 authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by sanglipeng
Browse files

pwm: sifive: Reduce time the controller lock is held

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.173
commit 8b98e7a45e6382b75cacf7932bcdb27482a56e49
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8BFR3

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8b98e7a45e6382b75cacf7932bcdb27482a56e49



--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 0f02f491 ]

The lock is only to serialize access and update to user_count and
approx_period between different PWMs served by the same pwm_chip.
So the lock needs only to be taken during the check if the (chip global)
period can and/or needs to be changed.

Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: default avatarEmil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Stable-dep-of: 334c7b13 ("pwm: sifive: Always let the first pwm_apply_state succeed")
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarsanglipeng <sanglipeng1@jd.com>
parent 31a04626
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+5 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@

struct pwm_sifive_ddata {
	struct pwm_chip	chip;
	struct mutex lock; /* lock to protect user_count */
	struct mutex lock; /* lock to protect user_count and approx_period */
	struct notifier_block notifier;
	struct clk *clk;
	void __iomem *regs;
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static void pwm_sifive_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
	mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);
}

/* Called holding ddata->lock */
static void pwm_sifive_update_clock(struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata,
				    unsigned long rate)
{
@@ -163,7 +164,6 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
		return ret;
	}

	mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
	cur_state = pwm->state;
	enabled = cur_state.enabled;

@@ -182,14 +182,17 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
	/* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
	frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);

	mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
	if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) {
		if (ddata->user_count != 1) {
			mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);
			ret = -EBUSY;
			goto exit;
		}
		ddata->approx_period = state->period;
		pwm_sifive_update_clock(ddata, clk_get_rate(ddata->clk));
	}
	mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);

	writel(frac, ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));

@@ -198,7 +201,6 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,

exit:
	clk_disable(ddata->clk);
	mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);
	return ret;
}