Commit b5ead35e authored by Johannes Weiner's avatar Johannes Weiner Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

mm: vmscan: naming fixes: global_reclaim() and sane_reclaim()

Seven years after introducing the global_reclaim() function, I still have
to double take when reading a callsite.  I don't know how others do it,
this is a terrible name.

Invert the meaning and rename it to cgroup_reclaim().

[ After all, "global reclaim" is just regular reclaim invoked from the
  page allocator. It's reclaim on behalf of a cgroup limit that is a
  special case of reclaim, and should be explicit - not the reverse. ]

sane_reclaim() isn't very descriptive either: it tests whether we can use
the regular writeback throttling - available during regular page reclaim
or cgroup2 limit reclaim - or need to use the broken
wait_on_page_writeback() method.  Use "writeback_throttling_sane()".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022144803.302233-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org


Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a1086291
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+18 −20
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
}

static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
	return sc->target_mem_cgroup;
}

/**
 * sane_reclaim - is the usual dirty throttling mechanism operational?
 * writeback_throttling_sane - is the usual dirty throttling mechanism available?
 * @sc: scan_control in question
 *
 * The normal page dirty throttling mechanism in balance_dirty_pages() is
@@ -257,11 +257,9 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 * This function tests whether the vmscan currently in progress can assume
 * that the normal dirty throttling mechanism is operational.
 */
static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
{
	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;

	if (!memcg)
	if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc))
		return true;
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
	if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
@@ -302,12 +300,12 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
{
}

static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
	return true;
	return false;
}

static bool sane_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
{
	return true;
}
@@ -1227,7 +1225,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
				goto activate_locked;

			/* Case 2 above */
			} else if (sane_reclaim(sc) ||
			} else if (writeback_throttling_sane(sc) ||
			    !PageReclaim(page) || !may_enter_fs) {
				/*
				 * This is slightly racy - end_page_writeback()
@@ -1821,7 +1819,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
	if (current_is_kswapd())
		return 0;

	if (!sane_reclaim(sc))
	if (!writeback_throttling_sane(sc))
		return 0;

	if (file) {
@@ -1971,7 +1969,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;

	item = current_is_kswapd() ? PGSCAN_KSWAPD : PGSCAN_DIRECT;
	if (global_reclaim(sc))
	if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc))
		__count_vm_events(item, nr_scanned);
	__count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), item, nr_scanned);
	spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
@@ -1985,7 +1983,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
	spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);

	item = current_is_kswapd() ? PGSTEAL_KSWAPD : PGSTEAL_DIRECT;
	if (global_reclaim(sc))
	if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc))
		__count_vm_events(item, nr_reclaimed);
	__count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), item, nr_reclaimed);
	reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[0] += stat.nr_activate[0];
@@ -2309,7 +2307,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
	 * using the memory controller's swap limit feature would be
	 * too expensive.
	 */
	if (!global_reclaim(sc) && !swappiness) {
	if (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && !swappiness) {
		scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
		goto out;
	}
@@ -2333,7 +2331,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
	 * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than
	 * anon pages.  Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
	 */
	if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
	if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
		unsigned long pgdatfile;
		unsigned long pgdatfree;
		int z;
@@ -2564,7 +2562,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc
	 * abort proportional reclaim if either the file or anon lru has already
	 * dropped to zero at the first pass.
	 */
	scan_adjusted = (global_reclaim(sc) && !current_is_kswapd() &&
	scan_adjusted = (!cgroup_reclaim(sc) && !current_is_kswapd() &&
			 sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY);

	blk_start_plug(&plug);
@@ -2853,7 +2851,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
		 * Legacy memcg will stall in page writeback so avoid forcibly
		 * stalling in wait_iff_congested().
		 */
		if (!global_reclaim(sc) && sane_reclaim(sc) &&
		if (cgroup_reclaim(sc) && writeback_throttling_sane(sc) &&
		    sc->nr.dirty && sc->nr.dirty == sc->nr.congested)
			set_memcg_congestion(pgdat, root, true);

@@ -2948,7 +2946,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
		 * to global LRU.
		 */
		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
		if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
			if (!cpuset_zone_allowed(zone,
						 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HARDWALL))
				continue;
@@ -3048,7 +3046,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
retry:
	delayacct_freepages_start();

	if (global_reclaim(sc))
	if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc))
		__count_zid_vm_events(ALLOCSTALL, sc->reclaim_idx, 1);

	do {