Commit ace2bee8 authored by Yafang Shao's avatar Yafang Shao Committed by Alexei Starovoitov
Browse files

bpf: Make non-preallocated allocation low priority

GFP_ATOMIC doesn't cooperate well with memcg pressure so far, especially
if we allocate too much GFP_ATOMIC memory. For example, when we set the
memcg limit to limit a non-preallocated bpf memory, the GFP_ATOMIC can
easily break the memcg limit by force charge. So it is very dangerous to
use GFP_ATOMIC in non-preallocated case. One way to make it safe is to
remove __GFP_HIGH from GFP_ATOMIC, IOW, use (__GFP_ATOMIC |
__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM) instead, then it will be limited if we allocate
too much memory. There's a plan to completely remove __GFP_ATOMIC in the
mm side[1], so let's use GFP_NOWAIT instead.

We introduced BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC is because full map pre-allocation is
too memory expensive for some cases. That means removing __GFP_HIGH
doesn't break the rule of BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC, but has the same goal with
it-avoiding issues caused by too much memory. So let's remove it.

This fix can also apply to other run-time allocations, for example, the
allocation in lpm trie, local storage and devmap. So let fix it
consistently over the bpf code

It also fixes a typo in the comment.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/163712397076.13692.4727608274002939094@noble.neil.brown.name/



Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220709154457.57379-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 1d5f82d9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ static struct bpf_dtab_netdev *__dev_map_alloc_node(struct net *net,
	struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dev;

	dev = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&dtab->map, sizeof(*dev),
				   GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
				   GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
				   dtab->map.numa_node);
	if (!dev)
		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+3 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
 *
 * As regular device interrupt handlers and soft interrupts are forced into
 * thread context, the existing code which does
 *   spin_lock*(); alloc(GPF_ATOMIC); spin_unlock*();
 *   spin_lock*(); alloc(GFP_ATOMIC); spin_unlock*();
 * just works.
 *
 * In theory the BPF locks could be converted to regular spinlocks as well,
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
				goto dec_count;
			}
		l_new = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&htab->map, htab->elem_size,
					     GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
					     GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
					     htab->map.numa_node);
		if (!l_new) {
			l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
		} else {
			/* alloc_percpu zero-fills */
			pptr = bpf_map_alloc_percpu(&htab->map, size, 8,
						    GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
						    GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
			if (!pptr) {
				kfree(l_new);
				l_new = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
	}

	new = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, struct_size(new, data, map->value_size),
				   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
				   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
				   map->numa_node);
	if (!new)
		return -ENOMEM;
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static struct lpm_trie_node *lpm_trie_node_alloc(const struct lpm_trie *trie,
	if (value)
		size += trie->map.value_size;

	node = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&trie->map, size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
	node = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&trie->map, size, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,
				    trie->map.numa_node);
	if (!node)
		return NULL;