selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test

The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:

  # test_progs -t perf_buffer
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
  skipping offline CPU #4
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:buf_cnt 0 nsec
  ...
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:fd_check 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:drain_buf 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:consume_buf 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:FAIL:cpu_seen cpu 5 not seen
  #88 perf_buffer:FAIL
  Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

If the offline cpu is from the middle of the possible set,
we get mismatch with possible and online cpu buffers.

The perf buffer test calls perf_buffer__consume_buffer for
all 'possible' cpus, but the library holds only 'online'
cpu buffers and perf_buffer__consume_buffer returns them
based on index.

Adding extra (online) index to keep track of online buffers,
we need the original (possible) index to trigger trace on
proper cpu.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-3-jolsa@kernel.org