Commit a4382659 authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker Committed by Paul E. McKenney
Browse files

rcu: Ignore rdp.cpu_no_qs.b.exp on preemptible RCU's rcu_qs()



Preemptible RCU does not use the rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp,
instead using a separate ->exp_deferred_qs field to record the need for
an expedited quiescent state.

In fact ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp should never be set in preemptible RCU because
preemptible RCU's expedited grace periods use other mechanisms to record
quiescent states.

This commit therefore removes the implicit rcu_qs() reference to
->cpu_no_qs.b.exp in favor of a direct reference to ->cpu_no_qs.b.norm.

Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
parent 8c0abfd6
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+5 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -277,12 +277,16 @@ static void rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 * current task, there might be any number of other tasks blocked while
 * in an RCU read-side critical section.
 *
 * Unlike non-preemptible-RCU, quiescent state reports for expedited
 * grace periods are handled separately via deferred quiescent states
 * and context switch events.
 *
 * Callers to this function must disable preemption.
 */
static void rcu_qs(void)
{
	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(preemptible(), "rcu_qs() invoked with preemption enabled!!!\n");
	if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.s)) {
	if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm)) {
		trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
				       __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.gp_seq),
				       TPS("cpuqs"));