Loading Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt +7 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ bits will no longer change the uid or gid; file capabilities will not add to the permitted set, and LSMs will not relax constraints after execve. To set no_new_privs, use prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0). Be careful, though: LSMs might also not tighten constraints on exec in no_new_privs mode. (This means that setting up a general-purpose service launcher to set no_new_privs before execing daemons may interfere with LSM-based sandboxing.) Note that no_new_privs does not prevent privilege changes that do not involve execve. An appropriately privileged task can still call setuid(2) and receive SCM_RIGHTS datagrams. Loading include/linux/prctl.h +2 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ * Changing LSM security domain is considered a new privilege. So, for example, * asking selinux for a specific new context (e.g. with runcon) will result * in execve returning -EPERM. * * See Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt for more details. */ #define PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 38 #define PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 39 Loading Loading
Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt +7 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ bits will no longer change the uid or gid; file capabilities will not add to the permitted set, and LSMs will not relax constraints after execve. To set no_new_privs, use prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0). Be careful, though: LSMs might also not tighten constraints on exec in no_new_privs mode. (This means that setting up a general-purpose service launcher to set no_new_privs before execing daemons may interfere with LSM-based sandboxing.) Note that no_new_privs does not prevent privilege changes that do not involve execve. An appropriately privileged task can still call setuid(2) and receive SCM_RIGHTS datagrams. Loading
include/linux/prctl.h +2 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ * Changing LSM security domain is considered a new privilege. So, for example, * asking selinux for a specific new context (e.g. with runcon) will result * in execve returning -EPERM. * * See Documentation/prctl/no_new_privs.txt for more details. */ #define PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 38 #define PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 39 Loading