Skip to content
Commit 931ab4a5 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney
Browse files

atomics: Revert addition of comment header to spin_unlock_wait()



There is still considerable confusion as to the semantics of
spin_unlock_wait(), but there seems to be universal agreement that
it is not that of a lock/unlock pair.  This commit therefore removes
the comment added by 6016ffc3 ("atomics: Add header comment so
spin_unlock_wait()") in order to prevent at least that flavor of
confusion.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent 520eccdf
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment