Commit 8c52cca0 authored by Waiman Long's avatar Waiman Long Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

locking/locktorture: Fix incorrect use of ww_acquire_ctx in ww_mutex test



The ww_acquire_ctx structure for ww_mutex needs to persist for a complete
lock/unlock cycle. In the ww_mutex test in locktorture, however, both
ww_acquire_init() and ww_acquire_fini() are called within the lock
function only. This causes a lockdep splat of "WARNING: Nested lock
was not taken" when lockdep is enabled in the kernel.

To fix this problem, we need to move the ww_acquire_fini() after
the ww_mutex_unlock() in torture_ww_mutex_unlock(). This is done by
allocating a global array of ww_acquire_ctx structures. Each locking
thread is associated with its own ww_acquire_ctx via the unique thread
id it has so that both the lock and unlock functions can access the
same ww_acquire_ctx structure.

Signed-off-by: default avatarWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318172814.4400-6-longman@redhat.com
parent aa3a5f31
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+27 −12
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -374,15 +374,27 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 */
static DEFINE_WD_CLASS(torture_ww_class);
static struct ww_mutex torture_ww_mutex_0, torture_ww_mutex_1, torture_ww_mutex_2;
static struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_acquire_ctxs;

static void torture_ww_mutex_init(void)
{
	ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_0, &torture_ww_class);
	ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_1, &torture_ww_class);
	ww_mutex_init(&torture_ww_mutex_2, &torture_ww_class);

	ww_acquire_ctxs = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealwriters_stress,
					sizeof(*ww_acquire_ctxs),
					GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!ww_acquire_ctxs)
		VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("ww_acquire_ctx: Out of memory");
}

static void torture_ww_mutex_exit(void)
{
	kfree(ww_acquire_ctxs);
}

static int torture_ww_mutex_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
static int torture_ww_mutex_lock(int tid)
__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_0)
__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_1)
__acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
@@ -392,7 +404,7 @@ __acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
		struct list_head link;
		struct ww_mutex *lock;
	} locks[3], *ll, *ln;
	struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx;
	struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx = &ww_acquire_ctxs[tid];

	locks[0].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_0;
	list_add(&locks[0].link, &list);
@@ -403,12 +415,12 @@ __acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
	locks[2].lock = &torture_ww_mutex_2;
	list_add(&locks[2].link, &list);

	ww_acquire_init(&ctx, &torture_ww_class);
	ww_acquire_init(ctx, &torture_ww_class);

	list_for_each_entry(ll, &list, link) {
		int err;

		err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, &ctx);
		err = ww_mutex_lock(ll->lock, ctx);
		if (!err)
			continue;

@@ -419,26 +431,29 @@ __acquires(torture_ww_mutex_2)
		if (err != -EDEADLK)
			return err;

		ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, &ctx);
		ww_mutex_lock_slow(ll->lock, ctx);
		list_move(&ll->link, &list);
	}

	ww_acquire_fini(&ctx);
	return 0;
}

static void torture_ww_mutex_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused)
static void torture_ww_mutex_unlock(int tid)
__releases(torture_ww_mutex_0)
__releases(torture_ww_mutex_1)
__releases(torture_ww_mutex_2)
{
	struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx = &ww_acquire_ctxs[tid];

	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_0);
	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_1);
	ww_mutex_unlock(&torture_ww_mutex_2);
	ww_acquire_fini(ctx);
}

static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
	.init		= torture_ww_mutex_init,
	.exit		= torture_ww_mutex_exit,
	.writelock	= torture_ww_mutex_lock,
	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
@@ -924,16 +939,16 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
		goto unwind;
	}

	if (cxt.cur_ops->init) {
		cxt.cur_ops->init();
		cxt.init_called = true;
	}

	if (nwriters_stress >= 0)
		cxt.nrealwriters_stress = nwriters_stress;
	else
		cxt.nrealwriters_stress = 2 * num_online_cpus();

	if (cxt.cur_ops->init) {
		cxt.cur_ops->init();
		cxt.init_called = true;
	}

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
	if (str_has_prefix(torture_type, "mutex"))
		cxt.debug_lock = true;