Unverified Commit 815b95be authored by openeuler-ci-bot's avatar openeuler-ci-bot Committed by Gitee
Browse files

!11469 OLK-6.6 Revert gpiolib bugfix

Merge Pull Request from: @lujunhuaHW 
 
Previous patch modified the standard used by acpi_gpiochip_find()
to match device nodes. Using the device node set in gc->gpiodev->d-
ev instead of gc->parent.

However, there is a situation in gpio-dwapb where the GPIO device
driver will set gc->fwnode for each port corresponding to a child
node under a GPIO device, so gc->gpiodev->dev will be assigned the
value of each child node in gpiochip_add_data().

gpio-dwapb.c:
128,31 static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
                               struct dwapb_port_property *pp,
                               unsigned int offs);
port->gc.fwnode = pp->fwnode;

693,39 static int dwapb_gpio_probe;
err = dwapb_gpio_add_port(gpio, &pdata->properties[i], i);

When other drivers request GPIO pin resources through the GPIO device
node provided by ACPI (corresponding to the parent node), the change
of the matching object to gc->gpiodev->dev in acpi_gpiochip_find()
only allows finding the value of each port (child node), resulting
in a failed request.

Reapply the condition of using gc->parent for match in acpi_gpio-
chip_find() in the code can compatible with the problem of gpio-dwapb,
and will not affect the two cases mentioned in the patch:
1. There is no setting for gc->fwnode.
2. The case that depends on using gc->fwnode for match.

ISSUE:https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IAQ1MS
 
 
Link:https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/11469

 

Signed-off-by: default avatarZhang Peng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
parents db19e032 f8b15ad4
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+17 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -128,8 +128,23 @@ static bool acpi_gpio_deferred_req_irqs_done;

static int acpi_gpiochip_find(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
{
	return device_match_acpi_handle(&gc->gpiodev->dev, data) ||
		(gc->parent && device_match_acpi_handle(gc->parent, data));
	/* First check the actual GPIO device */
	if (device_match_acpi_handle(&gc->gpiodev->dev, data))
		return true;

	/*
	 * When the ACPI device is artificially split to the banks of GPIOs,
	 * where each of them is represented by a separate GPIO device,
	 * the firmware node of the physical device may not be shared among
	 * the banks as they may require different values for the same property,
	 * e.g., number of GPIOs in a certain bank. In such case the ACPI handle
	 * of a GPIO device is NULL and can not be used. Hence we have to check
	 * the parent device to be sure that there is no match before bailing
	 * out.
	 */
	if (gc->parent)
		return device_match_acpi_handle(gc->parent, data);
	return false;
}

/**