Commit 805a0f83 authored by Stephen Zhang's avatar Stephen Zhang Committed by Paolo Bonzini
Browse files

KVM: x86/mmu: Add '__func__' in rmap_printk()



Given the common pattern:

rmap_printk("%s:"..., __func__,...)

we could improve this by adding '__func__' in rmap_printk().

Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Zhang <stephenzhangzsd@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1611713325-3591-1-git-send-email-stephenzhangzsd@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 04548ed0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −10
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -844,17 +844,17 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
	int i, count = 0;

	if (!rmap_head->val) {
		rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx 0->1\n", spte, *spte);
		rmap_printk("%p %llx 0->1\n", spte, *spte);
		rmap_head->val = (unsigned long)spte;
	} else if (!(rmap_head->val & 1)) {
		rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
		rmap_printk("%p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
		desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
		desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)rmap_head->val;
		desc->sptes[1] = spte;
		rmap_head->val = (unsigned long)desc | 1;
		++count;
	} else {
		rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte);
		rmap_printk("%p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte);
		desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul);
		while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) {
			count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
@@ -906,14 +906,14 @@ static void __pte_list_remove(u64 *spte, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
		pr_err("%s: %p 0->BUG\n", __func__, spte);
		BUG();
	} else if (!(rmap_head->val & 1)) {
		rmap_printk("%s:  %p 1->0\n", __func__, spte);
		rmap_printk("%p 1->0\n", spte);
		if ((u64 *)rmap_head->val != spte) {
			pr_err("%s:  %p 1->BUG\n", __func__, spte);
			BUG();
		}
		rmap_head->val = 0;
	} else {
		rmap_printk("%s:  %p many->many\n", __func__, spte);
		rmap_printk("%p many->many\n", spte);
		desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul);
		prev_desc = NULL;
		while (desc) {
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
	      !(pt_protect && spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte)))
		return false;

	rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
	rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);

	if (pt_protect)
		spte &= ~SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ static bool spte_clear_dirty(u64 *sptep)
{
	u64 spte = *sptep;

	rmap_printk("rmap_clear_dirty: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
	rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);

	MMU_WARN_ON(!spte_ad_enabled(spte));
	spte &= ~shadow_dirty_mask;
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static bool spte_set_dirty(u64 *sptep)
{
	u64 spte = *sptep;

	rmap_printk("rmap_set_dirty: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
	rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);

	/*
	 * Similar to the !kvm_x86_ops.slot_disable_log_dirty case,
@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ static bool kvm_zap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
	bool flush = false;

	while ((sptep = rmap_get_first(rmap_head, &iter))) {
		rmap_printk("%s: spte %p %llx.\n", __func__, sptep, *sptep);
		rmap_printk("spte %p %llx.\n", sptep, *sptep);

		pte_list_remove(rmap_head, sptep);
		flush = true;
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,

restart:
	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep) {
		rmap_printk("kvm_set_pte_rmapp: spte %p %llx gfn %llx (%d)\n",
		rmap_printk("spte %p %llx gfn %llx (%d)\n",
			    sptep, *sptep, gfn, level);

		need_flush = 1;
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
extern bool dbg;

#define pgprintk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
#define rmap_printk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
#define rmap_printk(fmt, args...) do { if (dbg) printk("%s: " fmt, __func__, ## args); } while (0)
#define MMU_WARN_ON(x) WARN_ON(x)
#else
#define pgprintk(x...) do { } while (0)