Commit 72b43570 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Jiri Kosina
Browse files

ext2: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c 



'excpet' should be 'except'.
'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'.

Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
parent 35df8397

fs/ext2/inode.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode, 
 *	the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after

 *	we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last

 *	triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same

 *	picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one

 *	picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one

 *	place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not

 *	set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should

 *	be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap.
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, 
	mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex);

	/*

	 * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading

	 * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or

	 * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or

	 * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore,

	 * (either because another process truncated this branch, or

	 * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if