Commit 618d653a authored by Pavel Begunkov's avatar Pavel Begunkov Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

io_uring: don't raw spin unlock to match cq_lock



There is one newly added place when we lock ring with io_cq_lock() but
unlocking is hand coded calling spin_unlock directly. It's ugly and
troublesome in the long run. Make it consistent with the other completion
locking.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4ca4f0564492b90214a190cd5b2a6c76522de138.1669821213.git.asml.silence@gmail.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 443e5755
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ bool io_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool defer, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32
		io_cq_lock(ctx);
		__io_flush_post_cqes(ctx);
		/* no need to flush - flush is deferred */
		spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
		io_cq_unlock(ctx);
	}

	/* For defered completions this is not as strict as it is otherwise,
+5 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
}

static inline void io_cq_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
}

void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);

static inline struct io_uring_cqe *io_get_cqe_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,