Commit 5c8f6a2e authored by Lai Jiangshan's avatar Lai Jiangshan Committed by Borislav Petkov
Browse files

x86/xen: Add xenpv_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode()



In the native case, PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss_rw + TSS_sp0) is the
trampoline stack. But XEN pv doesn't use trampoline stack, so
PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss_rw + TSS_sp0) is also the kernel stack.

In that case, source and destination stacks are identical, which means
that reusing swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode() in XEN pv
would cause %rsp to move up to the top of the kernel stack and leave the
IRET frame below %rsp.

This is dangerous as it can be corrupted if #NMI / #MC hit as either of
these events occurring in the middle of the stack pushing would clobber
data on the (original) stack.

And, with  XEN pv, swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode() pushing
the IRET frame on to the original address is useless and error-prone
when there is any future attempt to modify the code.

 [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Fixes: 7f2590a1 ("x86/entry/64: Use a per-CPU trampoline stack for IDT entries")
Signed-off-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBoris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211126101209.8613-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com
parent 1367afaa
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -574,6 +574,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
	ud2
1:
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV
	ALTERNATIVE "", "jmp xenpv_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode", X86_FEATURE_XENPV
#endif

	POP_REGS pop_rdi=0

	/*
+20 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@

#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <../entry/calling.h>

.pushsection .noinstr.text, "ax"
/*
@@ -192,6 +193,25 @@ SYM_CODE_START(xen_iret)
	jmp hypercall_iret
SYM_CODE_END(xen_iret)

/*
 * XEN pv doesn't use trampoline stack, PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss_rw + TSS_sp0) is
 * also the kernel stack.  Reusing swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode()
 * in XEN pv would cause %rsp to move up to the top of the kernel stack and
 * leave the IRET frame below %rsp, which is dangerous to be corrupted if #NMI
 * interrupts. And swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode() pushing the IRET
 * frame at the same address is useless.
 */
SYM_CODE_START(xenpv_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode)
	UNWIND_HINT_REGS
	POP_REGS

	/* stackleak_erase() can work safely on the kernel stack. */
	STACKLEAK_ERASE_NOCLOBBER

	addq	$8, %rsp	/* skip regs->orig_ax */
	jmp xen_iret
SYM_CODE_END(xenpv_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode)

/*
 * Xen handles syscall callbacks much like ordinary exceptions, which
 * means we have: