Commit 525e93f6 authored by Matthew Auld's avatar Matthew Auld
Browse files

drm/i915/uapi: add NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS hint



If set, force the allocation to be placed in the mappable portion of
I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE. One big restriction here is that system memory
(i.e I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM) must be given as a potential placement for the
object, that way we can always spill the object into system memory if we
can't make space.

Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-sanity-check
Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-big
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220629174350.384910-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
parent 1dbd07e0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+18 −8
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ struct create_ext {
	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
	struct intel_memory_region *placements[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN];
	unsigned int n_placements;
	unsigned int placement_mask;
	unsigned long flags;
};

@@ -337,6 +338,7 @@ static int set_placements(struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions *args,
	for (i = 0; i < args->num_regions; i++)
		ext_data->placements[i] = placements[i];

	ext_data->placement_mask = mask;
	return 0;

out_dump:
@@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
	int ret;

	if (args->flags)
	if (args->flags & ~I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS)
		return -EINVAL;

	ret = i915_user_extensions(u64_to_user_ptr(args->extensions),
@@ -427,13 +429,21 @@ i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
		ext_data.n_placements = 1;
	}

	if (args->flags & I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS) {
		if (ext_data.n_placements == 1)
			return -EINVAL;

		/*
	 * TODO: add a userspace hint to force CPU_ACCESS for the object, which
	 * can override this.
		 * We always need to be able to spill to system memory, if we
		 * can't place in the mappable part of LMEM.
		 */
		if (!(ext_data.placement_mask & BIT(INTEL_REGION_SMEM)))
			return -EINVAL;
	} else {
		if (ext_data.n_placements > 1 ||
		    ext_data.placements[0]->type != INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM)
			ext_data.flags |= I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY;
	}

	obj = __i915_gem_object_create_user_ext(i915, args->size,
						ext_data.placements,
+53 −8
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3366,11 +3366,11 @@ struct drm_i915_query_memory_regions {
 * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext - Existing gem_create behaviour, with added
 * extension support using struct i915_user_extension.
 *
 * Note that in the future we want to have our buffer flags here, at least for
 * the stuff that is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to
 * create the object with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters,
 * however this creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered
 * immutable. Also in general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls.
 * Note that new buffer flags should be added here, at least for the stuff that
 * is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to create the object
 * with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters, however this
 * creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered immutable. Also in
 * general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls.
 */
struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
	/**
@@ -3378,7 +3378,6 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
	 *
	 * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be returned.
	 *
	 *
	 * DG2 64K min page size implications:
	 *
	 * On discrete platforms, starting from DG2, we have to contend with GTT
@@ -3390,7 +3389,9 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
	 *
	 * Note that the returned size here will always reflect any required
	 * rounding up done by the kernel, i.e 4K will now become 64K on devices
	 * such as DG2.
	 * such as DG2. The kernel will always select the largest minimum
	 * page-size for the set of possible placements as the value to use when
	 * rounding up the @size.
	 *
	 * Special DG2 GTT address alignment requirement:
	 *
@@ -3414,14 +3415,58 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
	 * is deemed to be a good compromise.
	 */
	__u64 size;

	/**
	 * @handle: Returned handle for the object.
	 *
	 * Object handles are nonzero.
	 */
	__u32 handle;
	/** @flags: MBZ */

	/**
	 * @flags: Optional flags.
	 *
	 * Supported values:
	 *
	 * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS - Signal to the kernel that
	 * the object will need to be accessed via the CPU.
	 *
	 * Only valid when placing objects in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, and only
	 * strictly required on configurations where some subset of the device
	 * memory is directly visible/mappable through the CPU (which we also
	 * call small BAR), like on some DG2+ systems. Note that this is quite
	 * undesirable, but due to various factors like the client CPU, BIOS etc
	 * it's something we can expect to see in the wild. See
	 * &drm_i915_memory_region_info.probed_cpu_visible_size for how to
	 * determine if this system applies.
	 *
	 * Note that one of the placements MUST be I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, to
	 * ensure the kernel can always spill the allocation to system memory,
	 * if the object can't be allocated in the mappable part of
	 * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
	 *
	 * Also note that since the kernel only supports flat-CCS on objects
	 * that can *only* be placed in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, we therefore
	 * don't support I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS together with
	 * flat-CCS.
	 *
	 * Without this hint, the kernel will assume that non-mappable
	 * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE is preferred for this object. Note that the
	 * kernel can still migrate the object to the mappable part, as a last
	 * resort, if userspace ever CPU faults this object, but this might be
	 * expensive, and so ideally should be avoided.
	 *
	 * On older kernels which lack the relevant small-bar uAPI support (see
	 * also &drm_i915_memory_region_info.probed_cpu_visible_size),
	 * usage of the flag will result in an error, but it should NEVER be
	 * possible to end up with a small BAR configuration, assuming we can
	 * also successfully load the i915 kernel module. In such cases the
	 * entire I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE region will be CPU accessible, and as
	 * such there are zero restrictions on where the object can be placed.
	 */
#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 0)
	__u32 flags;

	/**
	 * @extensions: The chain of extensions to apply to this object.
	 *