Commit 4f432e8b authored by Borislav Petkov's avatar Borislav Petkov
Browse files

x86/mce: Get rid of mcheck_intel_therm_init()



Move the APIC_LVTTHMR read which needs to happen on the BSP, to
intel_init_thermal(). One less boot dependency.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210201142704.12495-2-bp@alien8.de
parent 7bb39313
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+0 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -304,12 +304,6 @@ extern int (*platform_thermal_package_notify)(__u64 msr_val);
 * callback has rate control */
extern bool (*platform_thermal_package_rate_control)(void);

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR
extern void mcheck_intel_therm_init(void);
#else
static inline void mcheck_intel_therm_init(void) { }
#endif

/*
 * Used by APEI to report memory error via /dev/mcelog
 */
+0 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2189,7 +2189,6 @@ __setup("mce", mcheck_enable);

int __init mcheck_init(void)
{
	mcheck_intel_therm_init();
	mce_register_decode_chain(&early_nb);
	mce_register_decode_chain(&mce_uc_nb);
	mce_register_decode_chain(&mce_default_nb);
+4 −11
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -633,17 +633,6 @@ static int intel_thermal_supported(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
	return 1;
}

void __init mcheck_intel_therm_init(void)
{
	/*
	 * This function is only called on boot CPU. Save the init thermal
	 * LVT value on BSP and use that value to restore APs' thermal LVT
	 * entry BIOS programmed later
	 */
	if (intel_thermal_supported(&boot_cpu_data))
		lvtthmr_init = apic_read(APIC_LVTTHMR);
}

void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -653,6 +642,10 @@ void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
	if (!intel_thermal_supported(c))
		return;

	/* On the BSP? */
	if (c == &boot_cpu_data)
		lvtthmr_init = apic_read(APIC_LVTTHMR);

	/*
	 * First check if its enabled already, in which case there might
	 * be some SMM goo which handles it, so we can't even put a handler