Commit 40a252c1 authored by Eli Cohen's avatar Eli Cohen Committed by Saeed Mahameed
Browse files

net/mlx5: Fix wrong comment 



A control irq may be allocated from the parent device's pool in case
there is no SF dedicated pool. This could happen when there are not
enough vectors available for SFs.

Signed-off-by: default avatarEli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
parent b94616d9

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c

+3 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -394,7 +394,9 @@ struct mlx5_irq *mlx5_ctrl_irq_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) 
		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

	cpumask_copy(req_mask, cpu_online_mask);

	if (!mlx5_irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool)) {

		/* In case we are allocating a control IRQ for PF/VF */

		/* In case we are allocating a control IRQ from a pci device's pool.

		 * This can happen also for a SF if the SFs pool is empty.

		 */

		if (!pool->xa_num_irqs.max) {

			cpumask_clear(req_mask);

			/* In case we only have a single IRQ for PF/VF */