Commit 3c6b1212 authored by Mario Limonciello's avatar Mario Limonciello Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
Browse files

ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints



When code uses a pre-increment it makes the reader question "why".
In the constraint fetching code there is no reason for the variables
to be pre-incremented so adjust to post-increment.
No intended functional changes.

Reviewed-by: default avatarKuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 3ac9b733
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void)
			acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle,
					  "LPI: constraints list begin:\n");

			for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
			for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
				union acpi_object *info_obj = &package->package.elements[j];
				struct lpi_device_constraint_amd dev_info = {};
				struct lpi_constraints *list;
				acpi_status status;

				for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; ++k) {
				for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; k++) {
					union acpi_object *obj = &info_obj->package.elements[k];

					list = &lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size];
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
		if (!package)
			continue;

		for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
		for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
			union acpi_object *element =
					&(package->package.elements[j]);

@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)

		constraint->min_dstate = -1;

		for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) {
		for (j = 0; j < package_count; j++) {
			union acpi_object *info_obj = &info.package[j];
			union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg;
			union acpi_object *obj;