Unverified Commit 2a8db5ec authored by Conor Dooley's avatar Conor Dooley Committed by Palmer Dabbelt
Browse files

RISC-V: Don't check text_mutex during stop_machine



We're currently using stop_machine() to update ftrace & kprobes, which
means that the thread that takes text_mutex during may not be the same
as the thread that eventually patches the code.  This isn't actually a
race because the lock is still held (preventing any other concurrent
accesses) and there is only one thread running during stop_machine(),
but it does trigger a lockdep failure.

This patch just elides the lockdep check during stop_machine.

Fixes: c15ac4fd ("riscv/ftrace: Add dynamic function tracer support")
Suggested-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: default avatarChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPalmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarConor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303143754.4005217-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
parent 76950340
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -109,6 +109,6 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
#define ftrace_init_nop ftrace_init_nop
#endif

#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */

#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FTRACE_H */
+2 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -9,4 +9,6 @@
int patch_text_nosync(void *addr, const void *insns, size_t len);
int patch_text(void *addr, u32 *insns, int ninsns);

extern int riscv_patch_in_stop_machine;

#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PATCH_H */
+11 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -15,10 +15,19 @@
void ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void) __acquires(&text_mutex)
{
	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);

	/*
	 * The code sequences we use for ftrace can't be patched while the
	 * kernel is running, so we need to use stop_machine() to modify them
	 * for now.  This doesn't play nice with text_mutex, we use this flag
	 * to elide the check.
	 */
	riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = true;
}

void ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process(void) __releases(&text_mutex)
{
	riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false;
	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
}

@@ -107,9 +116,9 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
{
	int out;

	ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare();
	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
	out = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
	ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process();
	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);

	return out;
}
+25 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <asm/kprobes.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/fixmap.h>
#include <asm/ftrace.h>
#include <asm/patch.h>

struct patch_insn {
@@ -20,6 +21,8 @@ struct patch_insn {
	atomic_t cpu_count;
};

int riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false;

#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
/*
 * The fix_to_virt(, idx) needs a const value (not a dynamic variable of
@@ -60,7 +63,14 @@ static int patch_insn_write(void *addr, const void *insn, size_t len)
	 * Before reaching here, it was expected to lock the text_mutex
	 * already, so we don't need to give another lock here and could
	 * ensure that it was safe between each cores.
	 *
	 * We're currently using stop_machine() for ftrace & kprobes, and while
	 * that ensures text_mutex is held before installing the mappings it
	 * does not ensure text_mutex is held by the calling thread.  That's
	 * safe but triggers a lockdep failure, so just elide it for that
	 * specific case.
	 */
	if (!riscv_patch_in_stop_machine)
		lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);

	if (across_pages)
@@ -125,6 +135,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_cb);

int patch_text(void *addr, u32 *insns, int ninsns)
{
	int ret;
	struct patch_insn patch = {
		.addr = addr,
		.insns = insns,
@@ -132,7 +143,18 @@ int patch_text(void *addr, u32 *insns, int ninsns)
		.cpu_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
	};

	return stop_machine_cpuslocked(patch_text_cb,
				       &patch, cpu_online_mask);
	/*
	 * kprobes takes text_mutex, before calling patch_text(), but as we call
	 * calls stop_machine(), the lockdep assertion in patch_insn_write()
	 * gets confused by the context in which the lock is taken.
	 * Instead, ensure the lock is held before calling stop_machine(), and
	 * set riscv_patch_in_stop_machine to skip the check in
	 * patch_insn_write().
	 */
	lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
	riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = true;
	ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(patch_text_cb, &patch, cpu_online_mask);
	riscv_patch_in_stop_machine = false;
	return ret;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text);