Commit 0d6695b1 authored by Stanislav Lisovskiy's avatar Stanislav Lisovskiy Committed by Jani Nikula
Browse files

drm/i915/adl_p: Same slices mask is not same Dbuf state



We currently treat same slice mask as a same DBuf state and skip
updating the Dbuf slices, if we detect that.
This is wrong as if we have a multi to single pipe change or
vice versa, that would be treated as a same Dbuf state and thus
no changes required, so we don't get Mbus updated, causing issues.
Solution: check also mbus_join, in addition to slices mask.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarUma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210527110106.21434-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
parent d62686ba
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -8093,7 +8093,8 @@ void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
		intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);

	if (!new_dbuf_state ||
	    new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
	    ((new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
	    && (new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus == old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus)))
		return;

	WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
@@ -8113,7 +8114,8 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
		intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);

	if (!new_dbuf_state ||
	    new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
	    ((new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
	    && (new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus == old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus)))
		return;

	WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);